Legal Opinion

Katz v. Warner-Lambert Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1998No. 98 Civ. 534(JSR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

RAKOFF, District Judge.

On January 26, 1998, defendant removed this action from the New York.state courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, asserting that the action satisfied the diversity jurisdiction requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332. On February 18, 1998, plaintiff moved to remand the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), arguing that the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000. Following review of the parties’ written submissions and oral argument, the Court, on April 16, 1998, telephonically informed the parties that plaintiffs motion would be denied. This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Theodore W. Kheel v. The Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Ray McCarty and Genevieve McCarty v. Amoco Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Leslie v. BancTec Service Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Bernard v. Gerber Food Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. In re Welding Fume Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  3. Mehl v. Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2005
  4. Maxons Restorations, Inc. v. NewmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Holcombe v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API