Legal Opinion

Deutscher v. Whitley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1991No. Nos. 88-2552, 88-2579PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Deutscher v. Whitley, 884 F.2d 1152 (9th Cir.1989), we granted Deutscher’s petition for writ of habeas corpus because he was represented by constitutionally deficient counsel at sentencing and was prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to present mitigating evidence and to challenge an unconstitutional aggravating factor. By order of the United States Supreme Court, we review this ruling in light of McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1454, 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991), and Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3092, 111 L.Ed.2d 606 (1990).

The government sufficiently pleaded abuse of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Campbell v. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. McKenna v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Riley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API