Legal Opinion

Chisler v. Randall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1927No. 27,558; No. 27,559PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

These are two actions for damages for libel. Harry Chisler is plaintiff in one and Wilbur E. Stone in the other. The pleadings are identical except the names of the plaintiffs. The defendants are H. E. Randall, George E. Gano and F. S. Macy. The cases were consolidated and tried to a jury in the court below. Each of the plaintiffs recovered a judgment for $17,043.75 against all of the defendants. The defendant Gano alone appeals.

The material facts disclosed by the record are substantially as follows: George E. Gano is a resident of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. McNeal v. GossardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Chemical Society v. Leadscope, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Israel Pagan Estate v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  3. Stoner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. William L. Brinkley v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, Helen L. Brinkley v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. Dill v. RaderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API