Legal Opinion

Chisler v. Byers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs sued to recover $4,010 for the conversion of oil-well casing. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant Gano. No judgment was rendered concerning defendants Byers or Huffine. The plaintiffs appeal.

Special questions were answered by the jury as follows:

“1. What was the fair market value of the pipe in controversy in 'the O’Hall oran well at the time the plaintiffs made their demand on Gano in September, 1924? A. $598.
“2. What was the fair market value of the pipe in controversy after it was pulled from the O’Halloran…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. Meskimen v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Chisler v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API