Legal Opinion
Chisler v. Byers
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,554PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiffs sued to recover $4,010 for the conversion of oil-well casing. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant Gano. No judgment was rendered concerning defendants Byers or Huffine. The plaintiffs appeal.
Special questions were answered by the jury as follows:
“1. What was the fair market value of the pipe in controversy in 'the O’Hall oran well at the time the plaintiffs made their demand on Gano in September, 1924? A. $598.
“2. What was the fair market value of the pipe in controversy after it was pulled from the O’Halloran…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Meskimen v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Chisler v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Chisler v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928