Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1984No. 8321DC1098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The sole issue we decide in this case is whether the trial court erred in failing to grant defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of adultery. We decide this issue in defendant’s favor and reverse.

The difficult issue of adultery has been the subject of two recent opinions of this court.

In Owens v. Owens, 28 N.C. App. 713, 222 S.E. 2d 704, disc. rev. denied, 290 N.C. 95, 225 S.E. 2d 324 (1976), defendant husband asserted a defense of adultery to plaintiff wife’s claim for alimony. Defendant’s evidence tended to show that plaintiff wife had lived with another man…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Horney v. HorneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Owens v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. In re the Estate of TrogdonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API