Legal Opinion

Horney v. Horney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1982No. 8118DC642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant brings forward numerous assignments of error relating to the admissibility of certain evidence. While we find it unnecessary to reach these contentions in the disposition of defendant’s appeal, we note at the outset that we have considered each of them and found them to be without merit. Nevertheless, while we hold that there was no error in the admission of various circumstantial evidence, and although we recognize that circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to support a finding of adultery, we conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Owens v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Chappell v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. In re the Estate of TrogdonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Beavers v. McMicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API