Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
Plaintiffs here move for summary judgment in this action for a declaratory judgment. The action seeks a declaration that a certain option is void, as being allegedly violative of the Rule against Perpetuities (the Rule) as adopted by the Legislature (by the Assembly on June 21, 1965 and by the Senate on June 22,1965, now EPTL 9-1.1, subd [b]).
*498The underlying facts are not unduly complex. However, they are important both to the parties, and to the public at large, since the requested judgment would not only have the effect of declaring void a particular…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Carrier v. . CarrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Beacon Terminal Corp. v. Chemprene, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Cambridge Co. v. East Slope Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Anderson v. 50 East 72nd Street CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Anderson v. 50 East 72nd Street CondominiumNew York Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.