Legal Opinion
Cambridge Co. v. East Slope Investment Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 28, 1985No. 83SC261PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
In Cambridge Company v. East Slope Investment Corporation, 672 P.2d 211 (Colo.App.1983), the Court of Appeals held that a right of preemption contained in a condominium declaration violated the rule against perpetuities. 1 We granted certiora-ri and now reverse.
The Tenmile Creek Condominiums, located in Summit County, are operated by the Tenmile Creek Condominium Association (Association), a corporation composed of all condominium unit owners. Ownership of the sixty condominium units in the project is subject to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Robroy Land Co. v. PratherWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. Meridian Athletic Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.