Legal Opinion

Klinke v. Harbison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1952No. 6204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

A rehearing is granted appellant, Fred C. Klinke, under the rule laid down in Korn v. Korn, Tex.Com.App., IS S.W.2d 1017, as appellant’s motion for a new trial authorizes a review of the action of the trial court in withdrawing the cause from the jury and granting judgment to appel-lees as recited in the judgment of said court.

Appellant and appellee, Vinson Pettit, have duly filed their motions for a rehearing in this cause. An understanding of the issue before the court requires a recitation of the original facts and issues and this opinion will embody the same and constitute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stevens v. KarrTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bennett v. CopelandTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rodgers v. FlemingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petit v. KlinkeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bowen v. BrawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Garmon v. San Diego Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Garmon v. San Diego Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Petit v. KlinkeTexas Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API