Petit v. Klinke
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood
This is a bailment controversy over an alleged shortage in wheat stored with the respondent, Klinke — our petitioners, Petit, Harbison and Waggoner, who were bailors, complaining here of the action of the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals in reversing a district court judgment in their favor against said respondent bailee, and remanding the cause for a new trial. See 248 S.W. 2d 545.
The suit was begun by the respondent bailee, with two additional bailors (Crammer and Stansbury) joined as co-plaintiffs, against the three petitioner bailors and one H. J. Hughes as defendants, the matter of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Rotsky v. Kelsay Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Klinke v. HarbisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Rodgers v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- De Winne v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Combs v. Fantastic Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.