Legal Opinion

Petit v. Klinke

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1953No. A-3664PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

This is a bailment controversy over an alleged shortage in wheat stored with the respondent, Klinke — our petitioners, Petit, Harbison and Waggoner, who were bailors, complaining here of the action of the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals in reversing a district court judgment in their favor against said respondent bailee, and remanding the cause for a new trial. See 248 S.W. 2d 545.

The suit was begun by the respondent bailee, with two additional bailors (Crammer and Stansbury) joined as co-plaintiffs, against the three petitioner bailors and one H. J. Hughes as defendants, the matter of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Rotsky v. Kelsay Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Klinke v. HarbisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Rodgers v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. De Winne v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Combs v. Fantastic Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API