Legal Opinion

Bushnell Real Estate, Inc. v. Nielson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1983No. 18284PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the plaintiff, Bushnell Real Estate, Inc., against the defendants, Robert S. and Bradley J. Nielson. The plaintiff sued to collect on a promissory note from the defendants for the unpaid portion of the plaintiff’s broker’s commission. The defendants admitted making and delivering the note, but denied liability on the grounds that the note was a “conditional contract” and that the condition was unfulfilled. At a hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the defendants moved for leave to amend their answer to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Seale v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dupler v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Day v. State Ex Rel. Utah Department of Public SafetyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API