Legal Opinion
James MATLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Etc., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1990No. 89-15263PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
In August of 1983 an Administrative Law Judge, after a hearing, issued a decision denying James Matlock’s application for supplemental social security benefits. The decision, which was mailed to both Matlock and his attorney, advised them that a request for Appeals Council review must be filed within 60 days after receipt of notice of the decision. No request for review was filed within 60 days. Instead, 18 months after the AU’s decision, Mat-lock filed a request for Appeals Council review, seeking, in effect, an extension of the time to file his appeal on the ground…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- George Dietsch v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Rena Watters v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Smith v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Karen Dexter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Evans v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Jane C. BACON, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Katherine K. BANTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.