Legal Opinion

Smith v. Berryhill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 28, 2019No. 17-1606PublishedCited by 551 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

*1771 The Social Security Act allows for judicial review of "any final decision ... made after a hearing" by the Social Security Administration (SSA). 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). Petitioner Ricky Lee Smith was denied Social Security benefits after a hearing by an administrative law judge (ALJ) and later had his appeal from that denial dismissed as untimely by the SSA's Appeals Council-the agency's final decisionmaker. This case asks whether the Appeals Council's dismissal of Smith's claim is a "final decision ... made after a hearing" so as to allow judicial review under § 405(g). We hold that it is.

I

A

Con…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by551 opinions

  1. Estate of Joseph Maglioli v. Alliance HC Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. Joseph Krell v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Eric White v. UALCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Mitchell v. Advanced HCSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

546 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API