Legal Opinion
In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 28, 2008No. 07-2257, 07-2258, 07-2259PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
This multi-district consumer action alleges a conspiracy by automobile manufacturers to illegally block lower-priced imports from Canada, which is alleged to have inflated the price of new cars sold in America. We granted this interlocutory appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) from the district court’s certifications of (1) a nationwide plaintiff class seeking injunctive relief under section 16 of the Clayton Act and Rule 23(b)(2), and (2) a class seeking damages under the antitrust and consumer protection laws of twenty states and Rule 23(b)(3).
Interlocutory…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-Op v. Bumble Bee Foods LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Aaron Espenscheid v. DirectSat USACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.