Legal Opinion

(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 10, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00083Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIC VARGAS (AKA DIAMOND CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0083 JLT (PC) VARGAS), 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN 13 FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE v. DENIED 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Docs. 2, 7) 15 CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) The Inmate Statement Report 19 submitted by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in support of plaintiff’s 20 application shows…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. In re SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API