Legal Opinion
In re Smith
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 5, 1932No. 16312PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNDERWOOD, District Judge.
The objecting creditor, the Hartsfield Company, on March 20, 1930, made a loan of $375 to C. W. Bishop, and took his note therefor. The bankrupt and another, H. C. Cary, signed this note as guarantors, making at the same time, on printed forms furnished by the creditor, statements setting forth their financial condition by means of filling in certain blanks in the forms.
The creditor contends that it extended .credit to said Bishop on the faith of these statements by the bankrupt and Cary, and that the statement made by the bankrupt was materially false and his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- Lockhart v. EdelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Hardie v. Swafford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
- Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartsfield Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- (PC) Lewis v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Santiago Pratt v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- In re ProutDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947