Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Conroy and Kline

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1933No. Appeal 47, 48, 49 and 50PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Appellants were tried and convicted on two indictments charging false pretense. The substance of the charge upon which the first indictment was based was that appellants falsely represented to Elizabeth Restenberger, the prosecuting witness, that they had searched the records for encumbrances against six adjoining and improved properties on Hanover Avenue in Allentown, and that these properties were free and clear of all encumbrances, whereas in fact they were encumbered, and known to appellants to be encumbered, with mortgages, aggregating $31,500; and that Mrs.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MendolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. FloriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. BerneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Commonwealth v. ForneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Ashland Towson Corp. v. KasunicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API