Legal Opinion

Ashland Towson Corp. v. Kasunic

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1933No. Appeal 68PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión- by

Keller, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The rule in force in this State, in passing upon such matters, is that summary judgment should not be entered if a substantial doubt exists as to the propriety of its entry: Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co., 311 Pa. 109, 111, 166 Atl. 557; Eizen v. Stecker Inc., 295 Pa. 497, 145 Atl. 606; Davis v. Investment Land Co., 296 Pa. 449, 146 Atl. 119; Armstrong v. Connelly, 299 Pa. 51, 149 Atl. 87; Kunkel v. Aircraft Control Corp., 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 35. In all those cases…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. International Transportation Ass'n v. BylengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Schupp v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Integrity Trust Co. v. St. Rita B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Lake v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Suraci v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Pittsburgh v. RuffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API