Legal Opinion
Sarah TAYLOR, Appellant, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1974No. 73-1796PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Mrs. Sarah Taylor appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing her suit against Honeywell, Inc., alleging violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) and (d). After trial to the court, the court found that Honeywell, Inc. had not violated the Act in its employment or its termination of Mrs. Taylor, nor had it practiced any form of discrimination toward her. We affirm.
The sole question presented on appeal is whether, to quote the appellant’s phrasing, “the District Court was clearly erroneous in failing to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- 6 Fair empl.prac.cas. 22, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8685 Samuel L. Woods v. North American Rockwell Corporation, a Corporation, and Local 952, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Paul Okada, and Okada Farms, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Central Kansas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- A. C. Lang and Curtis Lang v. Marshall Cone and Tom MagnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Wright v. Allis-ChalmersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1980