Quirk v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Halpern, J. (dissenting).
The majority memorandum, in my opinion, misconceives the nature of the document supplied by the Canadian authorities upon the basis of which the commissioner acted. It does not purport to be a formal certificate of conviction issued by the Magistrate. It purports to be, and it is, a certificate by J. P. Bickell, the Registrar of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Highways of Ontario, of the fact that, according to his records, the petitioner had been convicted of the “ offence of operating a motor vehicle while ability impaired ” in violation of section 223 of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.