Legal Opinion

United States v. Rowe

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 6, 1968No. 21,561PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam :

Before a special court-martial, the accused was represented by two commissioned officers and a warrant officer, none of whom was a qualified lawyer. He pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, two specifications of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. During sentence proceedings, one of the three counsel made a brief unsworn statement for the accused, in which he recited certain difficulties the accused had with his wife which “prompted him to go UA.” He also made a brief argument in which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SheeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. BroyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. HuffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. RosenblattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DemerseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. PointerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. SumterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975
  4. United States v. BrooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. SifuentesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API