Legal Opinion

Snake River Ranch, a General Partnership v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1976No. 75-1702PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-appellee brought this suit to quiet title on fifty-five acres of land along the Snake River in Wyoming against the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment for the plaintiff. The United States has taken this appeal.

The plaintiff is a family partnership which has been in possession since 1929, and has made extensive improvements on the disputed lands. These lands lie between a meander line survey and the Snake River west bank. The lots having the meander lines were patented to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Horne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Niles v. Cedar Point ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Producers Oil Co. v. HanzenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Helen Pappas, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Donald H. Albrecht and Rivermeadows Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Bontrager v. LA PLATA ELEC. ASS'N INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Pueblo of Taos v. AndrusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API