Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1979No. Nos. 77-1214, 77-1215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Theron S. Smith, Jesse Helzer and Violet Elma Helzer, who own land on the west bank of the South Canadian River in Dewey County, Oklahoma, filed a suit in federal court to quiet title to surface and mineral rights in 147.12 acres of land on the east side of the river. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, since the United States is named a defendant and claims title to the surface and mineral rights of the tract. J. P. Stephen*984son claims to own the surface rights of the land. Amoco Production Company became a party because it has a mineral…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Horne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Niles v. Cedar Point ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Donald H. Albrecht and Rivermeadows Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Charles W. Deboer v. United States of America and State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bradford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Bear v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bradford V. United States ex rel. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Division of Lands & MineralsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API