Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Healey (In re M.J.H.)

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 2018No. A16-1056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

The issue before us is whether the best-interests-of-the-child standard in Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 5(b) (2016), or the endangerment standard in Minn. Stat. § 518.18(d)(iv) (2016), applies to the motion of respondent Eric John Christensen to increase his parenting time to every other week. Christensen and appellant Danielle Marie Healey are the parents of a minor child. The parties stipulated to an initial order that granted Healey sole physical custody, subject to Christensen's parenting time. Several years later, the parties agreed to assign the child's primary residence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Marriage of Ayers v. AyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Marriage of Crowley v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Christensen v. HealeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amarreh v. AmarrehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa DozierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Justin Dean Schultz v. Analisa French PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API