Legal Opinion

Talbot v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 11, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., GARY TALBOT, Plaintiff, No. 17-cv-1997 (EGS) v. No. 19-cv-470 (EGS) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Gary Talbot (“Mr. Talbot”) brings this action against Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) for retaliation in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h)(Count I); violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2615, et seq.,1 (Count II); disability discrimination and hostile work…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API