Legal Opinion
Albert G. Ruben & Co. v. Fritzen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (A. F. Klein, J.), entered July 26, 1983, denying defendant James W. Barber’s (defendant) motion for partial summary judgment, without prejudice to renewal after completion of discovery, is unanimously affirmed, with costs. 11 This was a motion for partial summary *796judgment under CPLR 3212. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit “by a person having knowledge of the facts” (CPLR 3212, subd [b]). This motion was not supported by an affidavit by a person having knowledge of the facts. The only papers submitted in support of the motion are by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Werfel v. Zivnostenska BankaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- 175 East 74th Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Allston v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- 175 East 74th Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Doumbia v. BambaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Doumbia v. BambaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Gershon v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011