Legal Opinion

Werfel v. Zivnostenska Banka

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1941PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant is not entitled to summary judgment. Where on a motion for summary judgment the record as submitted by both parties reveals the existence of conflicting issues of fact which can only be resolved by a trial, summary judgment should not be granted. Upon such a motion the decisive consideration is the existence of conflicting issues of fact rather than the sufficiency of the pleadings considered without the supporting affidavits. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267, 272.)

Among the issues to be tried are the terms of the contract; what is the foreign law which either party claims to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Gibson v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Assaf v. Ropog Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Huber v. HuberNew York Supreme Court · 1960

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API