Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meade

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2010No. 2010-1494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Karen Kaye Meade of Parkman, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0017600, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983.

{¶ 2} On February 8, 2010, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a six-count complaint charging respondent with professional misconduct involving the representation of clients and termination of that representation and misconduct arising from her failure to respond to five disciplinary grievances filed against her. Relator attempted to serve respondent with a copy of its complaint by certified mail at her home and post office box, but the letter addressed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoffOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. NittskoffOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. NittskoffOhio Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API