Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nittskoff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2011No. 2010-2245Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David Nittskoff, of South Euclid, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0025471, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1970.

{¶ 2} In early 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, received a grievance alleging that Nittskoff had failed to inform his clients that he did not carry malpractice insurance and had neglected a client matter, causing the client to incur significant tax penalties.

{¶ 3} In December 2009, relator filed a formal complaint alleging that Nittskoff had committed several violations of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Professional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MathewsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoffOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API