Legal Opinion

Eastland v. Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1898No. 680PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Wichita County. From a judgment of the District Court on appeal from County Court, passing on the final report of Eastland as guardian of Maggie Williams, a minor, the guardian appealed, and the judgment having been reformed on cross-asignment of error by the ward, and affirmed, the guardian obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

O. Eastland was the guardian of the

estate of Maggie Williams, administered in the County Court of Wichita County. The County Judge cited Eastland to make a final report of his guardianship, which he did, and upon the settlement of his. final account the contest arose as to the various matters embraced in this writ of error. We have examined the assignments contained in the petition and find no error in the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals except in its ruling upon the cross-assignment of appellee, which is. as follows: “The court erred in holding that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. HillebrantTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Williams v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ingraham v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Logan v. GayTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hare v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Young Men's Ass'n v. CroftOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bolton v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. In Re Higganbotham's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API