Legal Opinion

Hare v. Pendleton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1919No. 2100PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by the appellee, W. A Pendleton, in the district court of Grayson county, against Silas Hare, administrator of the estate of one Samuel Bailey. The purpose of the suit was to recover the value of attorney's fees for services rendered to the executor of the will of Samuel Bailey in Oklahoma. The material facts are as follows: Samuel Bailey died in 1912 at his residence in Pottawatomie county, Okla. He left a will, in which he devised all of his property to Sherman Spencer, a nephew who was at that time residing in the state of Wisconsin. There were some collateral…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Green v. RugelyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. De Cordova v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Ochoa v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hewitt v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Hill v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. ReedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Duehay v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Pendleton v. HareTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. Estate of SwanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Corpus Christi Bank & Trust v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API