Moore v. Hillebrant
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Houston. It did not appear at whose suggestion the heirs of Burton were made parties.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
Hillebrant had a claim against the estate of J. W. Burton, deceased ; he presented it to the administrator of Burton, Green; it was allowed; and on the first day of March, A. D. 1844, it was approved by the Probate Judge. Subsequently one Jasper was appointed administrator de bonis ■non of the estate of Burton; and on the 16th day of October, A. D. 1848, Hillebrant filed his petition with the Probate Judge, setting forth his claim, its allowance, and approval by the Probate Judge, its being ranked among the acknowledged debts ■of the succession, the failure of the administrator to pay it, and…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Martin v. Robinson, 67 Tex. 368 (Tex. 1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Cannon v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Howard v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- McNeill v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.