Williams v. Borgwardt
California Supreme Court
Application for leave to file a stay bond in the Supreme Court, upon an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. A. R. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an application for leave to file a stay bond in this court under the rule of practice es*618tablished in Hill v. Finnigan, 54 Cal. 493. Since the decision of that case the inherent power of this court to make an order to operate as a supersedeas, upon condition that a good bond shall be filed here, has not been questioned, and frequently such orders have been made. But they have not been made, and they ought not to be made, in the absence of any excuse for the failure to give the undertaking or to justify the sureties in the manner and at the time prescribed and intended by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Owen v. Pomona Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Messenkop v. DuffieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kim v. ChinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.