Legal Opinion

Henry v. Roe & Burnside

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1892No. 3179PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge,

Section A.—This suit was instituted June 4,1890, by appellant, executrix of the estate of Eugene T. Henry, deceased, against A. J. Roe and J. B. Burnside, executors of the estate of William Henry, deceased, upon a note, as follows:

“$710. “Cairo, Illinois, January 1, 1872.
“On demand after date I promise to pay to the order of E. T. Henry $710, value received, without any relief of valuation or appraisement lawSl “Wm. Henry, Jr.”

The note had credits on it to the amount of $476.06, ten payments made from July 25, 1878, to September 14, 1888.

E. T. Henry resided in another State,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Eborn v. ZimpelmanTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Texas Banking & Insurance v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McDonald v. GreyTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Krueger v. KruegerTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Orphan Asylum v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Hodges v. KimballCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899
  3. Browne v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. New Ulm State Bank v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Taylor v. DoomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API