Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1990No. 1—90—0009, 1—90—0239 consPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Third-party plaintiff-appellant, Lawrence Engineering and Supply, Inc. (Lawrence), appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of third-party defendant-appellee, California Screw Products Corp. (CSPC). Lawrence contends that the circuit court erred in (1) entering summary judgment without first ruling on the choice of law issue regarding whether CSPC was a successor to the liabilities of its predecessor; (2) concluding that CSPC was not a corporate successor under Illinois law; and (3) granting summary judgment when genuine issues of material fact existed as to the corporate transfers…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. International Administrators, Inc. And Sheldon Harrison v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Nguyen v. Johnson MacHine & Press Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Felipe Ruiz v. Blentech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Malatesta v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Greystone Community Reinvestment Ass'n v. Berean Capital, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API