Legal Opinion
Carnegie v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 16, 1963No. 21846PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The issues for determination here are whether *586an adopted son of one of the testatrix’s grandsons is entitled to any interest in certain property under her will and, if so, the quantity of that interest.
The testatrix, Mrs. Lucy C. Carnegie, was a resident of the State of Pennsylvania. She executed her will in 1912 and made two codicils in 1913. Upon her death on January 16, 1916,. her will, with these codicils, was duly probated in both Pennsylvania and Georgia. In addition to disposing of other property the will devised Cumberland Island, Georgia, to trustees, set forth the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cave's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Cook v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Comer v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Sears v. MinchewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Brown v. Momar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Brown v. Trust Co. of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Douglas v. NewellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.