Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Newell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1986No. 85-105, 85-106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice.

Plaintiffs (appellants in Case No. 85-105 and appellees in Case No. 85-106) brought an action for declaratory judgment construing the will of Elizabeth Newell (hereinafter referred to as “deceased”) with respect to the occurrence or nonoccurrence of the ademption of a specific devise contained in Article X of the will, contending that it did not adeem. Defendants (appel-lees in Case No. 85-105 and appellants in Case No. 85-106) presented, as an affirmative defense, a contention that Article X had lapsed at the death of deceased’s husband. Both parties moved for a summary…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Evans v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Heinneman v. Colorado CollegeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shriners Hospitals for Children, In Its Capacity as Beneficiary of the Alfred J. and Pegge A. Cooksley Trust v. First Northern Bank of Wyoming, In Its Capacity as Trustee of the Alfred J. and Pegge A. Cooksley TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Matter of Estate of NewellWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of Estate of ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of Estate of MicheelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Briggs v. Wyoming National Bank of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API