Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1925No. Appeal, 402PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

From a decree in their favor, requiring defendants to make certain changes, as a condition to the city’s further continuing the use of one of its buildings as a stable for horses and a storage yard for vehicles, plaintiffs appeal because such use was not wholly enjoined.

By section 5 of article XX of the First Class City Charter Act of June 25, 1919, P. L. 581, 625, it is provided that “After the 31st day of December, 1920,...... the collection of ashes, waste, rubbish and garbage, ......shall be done directly by the city,” with an alter native provision (which,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodenhausen v. CravenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Bangor Silk Knitting Co. v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Burke v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Essick v. ShillamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Garr v. FulsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Clabby's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API