Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2000No. 98-205PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Convicted of possession of marijuana and possession with intent to deliver psilocybin mushrooms, appellant Ralph Trujillo (Trujillo) contends that the district court erred in admitting evidence of his prior drug transactions; that he was denied his constitutional right to counsel at sentencing; that he has been prohibited from freely exercising his religion; and that he was denied a fair trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. No errors occurred at trial, and we affirm the convictions. However, because we find that appellant did not knowingly and voluntarily…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Shey Elan BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. PedockieUtah Supreme Court · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API