Legal Opinion

State v. Pedockie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2006No. 20040746PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

{1 Defendant Robert Brian Pedockie was charged with aggravated kidnapping, a first degree felony. During pretrial proceedings, Pedockie was represented by a string of various public defenders and private attorneys, all of whom either withdrew or were fired. Despite Pedockie's invocation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the trial court allowed the trial to proceed with Pe-dockie representing himself. Pedockie was convicted and appealed.

T 2 The court of appeals held that Pedockie voluntarily waived his right to counsel through his dilatory conduct. It nevertheless…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. KammeraadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Peterson v. KennardUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. TerryKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. AmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API