Legal Opinion

Loy v. Loy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,608PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— The only error assigned by the appellant on the record of this cause is the overruling of his motion for a new trial. In this motion the only causes assigned for such new trial were, that the finding of the court was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that it was contrary to law. Manifestly, these causes for a new trial will present no question *405for the decision of this court, if it can be correctly said, as the appellee’s counsel claim, that the evidence is not in the record.

It is shown by the record that the cause was tried and judgment rendered on the 18th day of May, 1882; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bowen v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Dunn v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Board of Commissioners v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API