Legal Opinion
Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1962No. 17527PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, husband and wife, stand convicted of violations of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 174 & 176a. They claim that their convictions should be reversed because: 1) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdicts; 2) they were denied the full assistance of counsel which the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee them; and 3) the court incorrectly and inadequately instructed the jury.
We conclude that insofar as Mrs. Arellanes is concerned the evidence is insufficient. That conclusion does not extend to Mr. Arellanes. We recite the facts. 1
In the latter part of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Oscar Mancillas and Charles LowryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.