Legal Opinion

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 24, 1985No. 82 Civ. 4259 (RWS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff/counterclaim defendant Universal City Studios, Inc. (“Universal”) has brought a motion pursuant to Rule 59(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., for a partial new trial in the interests of substantial justice. Alternatively, Universal moves pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. for a hearing to determine whether Universal is entitled to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in defending against defendant Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc. (collectively, “Nintendo”) counterclaims for misappropriation of property and unjust enrichment. Nintendo opposes these motions and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Cathedral Estates, Inc. v. The Taft Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API