Legal Opinion
Garnac Grain Co. v. Boatmen's Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 16, 1988No. 84-1002-CV-W-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the summary judgment motion of Boatmen’s Bank & Trust Company of Kansas City (“Boatmen’s”) and First National Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, (“First National”) against the State Bank of Oskaloosa (“Oskaloosa”) and the summary judgment motion of Oskaloosa against Boatmen’s and First National.
For the reasons stated below, Boatmen’s and First National’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part and Oskaloosa’s motion will be denied.
I
This lawsuit arises out of an embezzlement perpetrated against plaintiff Garnac…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Perkins State Bank, a Florida Banking Corporation v. John Connolly, the Hanover National Bank of Wilkes-BarreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Sanger v. Yellow Cab Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- United States v. Ernestine Horton, D/B/A Pine View Manor Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDowell v. Dallas Teachers Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. First Union National BankFairfax County Circuit Court · 1998
- Hoppe v. First Midwest Bank of Poplar BluffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Acrometal Companies, Inc. v. First American Bank of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991