Legal Opinion
Ede v. Mueller Pump Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 3, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-K-636PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Introduction
Ede brings this diversity-based product liability action for injuries received on July 30, 1983 while using an Aeromotor windmill. The complaint alleges claims under theories of negligence and strict liability. The case is before me on two separate motions for summary judgment, one filed by Mueller Pump and one by Valley Industries.
Factual Background
Ede purchased his Aeromotor brand windmill in 1950. The windmill was manufactured by Aeromotor Company of Chicago, Illinois. In 1958, Aeromotor Company was sold to Motor Products…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Savage Arms, Inc. v. Western Auto Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Jacobs (In Re Kaiser Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
- Swayze v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Florom v. Elliott ManufacturingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Florom v. Elliott ManufacturingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989