Wells v. Martin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J :
Martin & Barnett sued plaintiffs in error for certain provisions and similar supplies furnished, and in form charged to one James McG-arry, but alleged to have been furnished to him as agent and on account of plaintiffs in error.
Wells & French, the plaintiffs in error, had taken a contract for building a part (or all, it does not appear which) of the Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore Railroad. Portions of this they let out to sub-contractors. On the 13th of September, 1870, they contracted with McGarry to construct a part of the line from the Grand river to Nunica, and from Grand…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bond v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ironwood Store Co. v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Danaher v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Somerville v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1896