Legal Opinion

Wells v. Martin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ottawa Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J :

Martin & Barnett sued plaintiffs in error for certain provisions and similar supplies furnished, and in form charged to one James McG-arry, but alleged to have been furnished to him as agent and on account of plaintiffs in error.

Wells & French, the plaintiffs in error, had taken a contract for building a part (or all, it does not appear which) of the Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore Railroad. Portions of this they let out to sub-contractors. On the 13th of September, 1870, they contracted with McGarry to construct a part of the line from the Grand river to Nunica, and from Grand…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bond v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ironwood Store Co. v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Danaher v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Somerville v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API