Ironwood Store Co. v. Harrison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic. (Williams, J.) As3umpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Action for goods sold and delivered.
In the spring and summer of 1887, Harrison & Green were contractors for building about sixty miles of railroad from *198the Montreal river to a point about eight miles from Bessemer, being a portion of the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railroad.
Guidio & Warner were subcontractors, and were to build about eight miles of the road. They were to have their job completed on or before the sixteenth of June.
Plaintiff is a corporation doing business at Ironwood, selling goods and supplies.
One Patrick Nickolson was an agent for Guidio & Warner. He was what was called a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hammerslough v. CheathamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- North v. MetzMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Wells v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cincinnati, H. & D. R. v. ThiebaudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- State v. ShepphardMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Spangler v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Cascarella v. National Grocer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Britt v. GordonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.