Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Pillsbury Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1989No. 85 Civ. 10072 (WCC)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs in this diversity action are Glenn and Andrea Rosenberg, and NYBO, Inc. (collectively, “the Rosenbergs”). Defendants are The Pillsbury Company, Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc., The Haagen-Dazs Shoppes, Inc. (collectively, “the Pillsbury defendants”), Reuben and Rose Mat-tus, Doris Mattus Hurley, Kevin Hurley, Haagen-Dazs Franchise, Inc., HDF Liquidating Corporation, 1 and Woodbridge Sweets, Inc. (collectively, “the Mattus defendants”). Plaintiffs instituted this action alleging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of good faith,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,496, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,186 Thorburn Kennedy, Trustee v. Josephthal & Company, Inc., Edward M. Swartz and Fredric SwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Krock v. LipsayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.