Legal Opinion
Ankrom v. Hageman, 06ap-735 (9-27-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 2007No. 06AP-735PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} On February 16, 2001, an Ohio prison inmate, Herbert Lilly, filed a pro se lawsuit against the Ohio Adult Parole Authority ("OAPA"). Subsequently, a public defender entered an appearance on behalf of the inmate and filed an amended complaint on March 26, 2001, adding more plaintiffs and defendants, and a second amended complaint on January 31, 2002. The public defender then filed a motion for class certification on April 18, 2001, which the trial court granted. The class consisted of all parole eligible Ohio prison inmates who pled guilty or no contest to lesser or fewer offenses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Van Camp v. RileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies v. BPS Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Preterm-Cleveland v. YostOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State ex rel. v. Big Sky EnergyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ohio Equity Fund for Hous. Ltd. Partnership XXVIII v. Irvin Cobb Mgr., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Ohio Veterans & Fraternal Charitable Coalition, Inc. v. Charitable Mgt. & Capital Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025