Legal Opinion

(PC) Vallery v. Botkin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 18, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00767Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 RAYNARD VALLERY, No. 2: 20-cv-0767 TLN KJN P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 B. BOTKIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Introduction 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state 19 a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 26.) 20 For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that defendants’…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API